Attendance: 28 members attended the AGM. Apologies for absence: S.Lambert, T.Lambert, S.Landles, F.Taylor. A.Renwick chaired the meeting
Agenda items:
1. Consideration of the minutes of the Annual General Meeting of 10th September 2022: Agreed without objection
1. Consideration of the minutes of the Annual General Meeting of 24th 1 2022: Agreed without objection.
2. Report: As well as the formal Report Document, the Chairman gave a verbal report on the activities since the last AGM; this included mention of Blyth Tall Ship, Seaham, Bridlington, Hartlepool, South Tyneside College, the need to pursue involvement of young people, and (in confidence) information concerning the proposed development of Dock 3 in South Shields: The Report was accepted without objection
2. Report: As well as the formal Report Document, the Chairman gave a verbal report on the activities since the last AGM; this included mention of the kitchen development, Boatshed internal refurbishment, completion of the “Bedford”, and events at Blyth and Newcastle. The Report was accepted without objection.
3. Consideration of the Accounts for the financial year ended 30th September 2022: Agreed without objection.
3. Consideration of the Accounts for the financial year ended 30th September 2022: Agreed without objection.
4. Election of Trustees. The re-appointment of retiring trustee Dr S.Griffiths Duly elected. The re-appointment of retiring trustee G.Linkleter: Not elected. Election of duly proposed new trustee: K.Lund: Duly elected
4. Election of Trustees. The re-appointment of trustee – Sue Griffiths, duly elected. The election and appointment of Kevin Lund as Trustee, duly elected in his absence.
5. Any Other Business not requiring advance notice:
5. After the Chairman tried to announce a previously agreed retirement of Mr Peter Weightman as Secretary; and while trying to commend Peter for his previous work as Secretary, there was an unsettling verbal outburst and objection by A. Finnegan which followed.
6. Any Other Business not requiring advance notice:
Any other Business
a.
The chairman announced that the Secretary, P.Weightman, had offered to stand down and that he, A.Renwick, would be taking over as Secretary for the time being. A.Finnegan objected and stated that the appointment is at the discretion of the Trustees only.2 P.Weightman said that he had not resigned but that all officers should be reviewed by the Trustees after every general meeting.
Sue Griffiths was recognised and thanked for her bookkeeping role; members gave their thanks and applause.
b.
Events: R.Branson gave a report on proposed events for attendance by NEMT this year, including Blyth Old Gaffers Association meeting, Bridlington Coble Festival, Cullercoats Lifeboat Day, and Tynemouth Lifeboat Day. There would be coble sailing most Saturdays over the summer.
M Dawson raised a question about why NEMT couldn’t pay NFHT an assumed debt owing “due to NEMT having over £48.000 in the bank” in reply, the Chairman pointed out that the accounts quite clearly state that his assumption was incorrect and that a payment was soon to be agreed with NFHT anyway.
c.
D.Parker detailed the work in progress on our coble Royal Diadem II. 3
A Renwick told the meeting of a potential “Historic Harbour” on the Tyne at the new Holborn Development; while talks continue with Council officials continue details are currently a matter of confidentiality.
d.
A.Finnegan reported on the planned rowing of our lifeboat Henry Frederick Swan and the work being undertaken by D.Seymour in manufacturing new oars for this vessel.
A. Smith thanked the “back room boys” to applause from those present.
e.
Accountants: It was agreed that Quantum continue to undertake the consultant accounting function for NEMT.4
Chairman final comment which stated that along with other events at Blyth etc. NEMT would be taking part in the Hartlepool Tall Ships event as harbour viewable exhibits to include the Henry Frederick Swan lifeboat.
f.
A.Smith expressed his thanks for the contribution of all in the workshops.
Inconsistencies:-
1 – no month given, which suggests the author of the second set of minutes, Mr K Lund is not referring to the AGM but to the meeting of 14th January. Further to our Policy Document previously approved and agreed at meeting on Friday 25th of November 2022. It is obvious that current financial conditions which include high inflation rates and additional financial uncertainties dictate that we must reassess our finances. This also includes those assessments previously agreed at board level to ensure the future sustainability of NEMT. This situation leads to the following two proposals for NFHT and other supported charitable organisations using NEMT facilities. It is hoped that these proposals will be agreed at the next NEMT meeting on 14th January as follows. 2 – the objection raised by A.Finnegan that the appointment of officers is at the discretion of the Trustees only, was overwritten by an unimportant detail, Sue Griffiths was recognised and thanked for her bookkeeping role; members gave their thanks and applause. 3 – D Parker gave details of a coble belonging to NFHT not NEMT. 4 – Sue Griffiths appears to have been replaced Quantum Accountancy Services Limited of Bolden Colliery.
Temporarily located on the time-line at 7:10 on the 29th October 2026 and updated on the 2nd November 2026.
From: Alec Renwick <alec.renwick@gmail.com> Sent: 06 January 2023 20:49 To: Michael Dawson <daw50nmdj@hotmail.co.uk> Subject: Re: Objection to proposed fraud by the charity – NEMT
Dear Mr Dawson,
In reference to you request for the November minutes.
There is currently a concern about the accuracy of the transcript. 1
As is usual minutes cannot be made public until agreed and approved by the board of directors. 2
Further to your slanderous accusations. 3
Please supply the evidence you use to form these beliefs. 4
Please be aware that should any more deflamatory allegations be made we will take advice with a view to legal action. 5
Yours sincerely
A Renwick. NEMT Chairman.
Notes: 1 – the original transcript had a list of all the NEMT attendees at the November meeting but the second transcript was written, I believe, by a Mr K Lund on behalf of the self appointed Chair of NEMT Mr A Renwick and the list of attendees had to be replaced with no list. 2 – the original minutes reflected fairly accurately what happened at the meeting and I believe its author Peter Weightman received no requests to make any corrections. 3 – no slanderous accusations were made. 4 – it needed a very limited knowledge of the law to know that the Legacy of of Gordon Brown made in 2016 was not carried out as he had wished. 5 – there was not even one defamatory allegation no more made and zero plus zero equals zero. 6 – there are no minutes of any NEMT meeting that show that he was an elected Chair of the Trust.
Listening to a two faced Mr Farage attempting to divert attention from one of his former aides describing the Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch as a “Nigerian scammer” on the BBC News on the morning of the 27th October 2026, I was reminded that Mr Alec Renwick had unjustly accused me of making defamatory allegations against him in 2023 to deflect the fact that after consulting a legal firm the debt to its sister Trust was paid 1.
What I had done on January 6th 2023, was to suggest to Mr Renwick, as the acting Chair of NEMT that he would do well not to associate with any those who claimed that that NEMT did not owe the NFHT anything from Gordon Brown’s Legacy.
Why the other signatories wish to keep what is rightfully the NFHT’s is shameful to say the least and you would do well not to associate yourself with such criminal activity.
A gross simplification but however one reads my email to Alec Renwick and its attachment, ‘Objection to proposed fraud by the charity – NEMT’ it is very clear that I think that one or two and possibly more of NEMT’s Trustees were behaving much like a bunch of Farage supporters and I concluded:-
This is a written objection and whether one calls the arbitrary cancellation of a debt embezzlement, misappropriation or theft, it is still a criminal offence.
My exchange with Mr Renwick first appeared as in public as one of the posts in the nemaritimetrust.co.uk website as ‘Development of a Fraud’ in January 2023. That post and the ones following show that my view that Alec Renwick was no better than fraudster, was sound. I would like to comment at this point that one could not be a member of NFHT if one was not a member of NEMT but I do not know if this rule still applies to NFHT’s successor, the Northumbria Fishing Heritage which replaced the NFHT in September 2024.
What I can confirm was that the acting Chair of NEMT was being two faced or hypocritical when on January the 7th 20232 when first he told me not to use his personal mailbox, alec.renwick@gmail.com then 9 minutes broadcast to 7 NEMT members not including myself, the lie that I was sending him more than one aggressive and personalised emails to him.
Mick Dawson 28-Oct-26
1 – If I had been making slanderous accusations against him, the North East Maritime Trust would not have been instructed to pay the Northumbrian Fishing Heritage Trust what they owed them in 2023. 2. on January the 6th 2023, he had falsely accused me of making slanderous accusations but these were changed on January 7th at 20:49 to more aggressive, personalised emails when he broadcast more misinformation about me to 7 members of NEMT.
The investment property was a legacy bequest from the late Mr Gordon F. Brown and comprised of 2 Tyneside flats.1 The fair value of the investment property has been arrived at on the basis of a valuation carried out in July 2017 by J D Storey & Co LLP, who are not connected with the Trust. The valuation was made on an open market value basis by reference to market evidence of transaction prices for similar properties. The late Mr G. F. Brown owned this property which he wished to leave to both the North East Maritime Trust (NEMT) and the Northumbrian Fishing Heritage Trust (NFHT). He instructed it was to provide income for both trusts, knowing that neither had regular income. 2
The property consisted of numbers 111 and 113 Dinsdale Road, Sandyford, Newcastle upon Tyne. Knowing that the NFHT was not incorporated and therefore unable to have title to real estate, Mr G. F. Brown gave his property to NEMT, which was incorporated, with instructions to make arrangements to benefit the NFHT.3 In accordance with Mr G. F. Brown’s instructions, the two trusts agreed to a settlement and NEMT confirmed the settlement terms in a Letter Of Intent to NFHT dated 22 May 2018.4 113 Dinsdale Road has now been sold and the proceeds donated to NFHT.
NEMT is retaining the property that is 111 Dinsdale Road and in accordance with Mr G. F. Brown’s instructions it is held as a source of rental income and not available for disposal.
Notes: 1 – two Tyneside flats one of which was sold on the 1st July 2019 for 152,000. The other has been rented out since then and comparable flats currently have a cost about of 18,000 per annum to rent. 2 – the Letter of Intent, 22-May-2018, implied that NEMT would pay what remained of the sale of No. 113, about 14,000 but is was not paid until I justly accused those in charge of NEMT of embezzlement. Justly because the matter was settled within a couple of months. 3 – NFHT is now the Northumbria Fishing Heritage: Registered as a charity (number 1210068) on the 1st January 2025 and it, as far as I can see, is doing what NEMT was originally set up to do and that is acquiring, conserving, and publicising historical items, records, photographs, audio archives, and historic boats linked to Northumbria’s fishing past. It took over the care of historic vessels previously managed by the dissolved Northumbrian Fishing Heritage Trust. 4 – Letter of Intent again, when the instruction was made to provide an income for both trusts, NEMT should have been passing half the income gained from 111 Dinsdale Rd to NFHT from the 1st July 2019 to the 31st December 2024, some 26.5k (40.5k-14k: see 2) and 13.5k to Northumbria Fishing Heritagefrom January 2025 until July 2026. As far as I am aware, only about 14k has been paid to either the NFHT or the NFH since July 2019.
The Post Views Counter passed 200k yesterday and this morning stands at nearly 200,200 and I’ve often wondered who were those who were taking such an interest my website nemaritimetrust.co.uk. Soon after the counter was put into website I was given the option with an extra cost to be given the names of those who had viewed the site but declined because I had been a Facebook User and knew that there were some who took delight in some rather perverted practices re the law etc. and thought it safer not to enter any discussion with them at all, else the truth about the nemaritimetrust.co.uk became totally obscured.
Passes a new landmark of 199,000 while its main page was being edited to correct a error which could be used by AI to suggest that I was a dishonest citizen of the UK.
The self-appointed Chair of NEMT says on this Website:-
Welcome to the only official North East Maritime Trust website. Based in South Shields, Tyne and Wear, England, we restore repair, maintain and sail important historic boats.
A view from the nemaritimetrust.co.uk’s owner:-
The only official North East Maritime Trust website wascreated on the 14-Oct-22 and appears to be based on the views of the current Chair of NEMT which fails to mentionall thework done by the Trust since it inception2003 and the award of its charitable status in early 2007 and much of the work done by the Trust’s members since 2007.
One can view the complete newsletter for September on nemaritimetrust.co.uk and while it is about the relaxation of the Covid restriction there are two items about the NEMT boats, the Bedford Lifeboat and the Royal Diadem II, the Lifeboat being in storage and latter moored safely on the Tyne in front of the Workshop and judging by the length of time since she was last hauled out she will be well overdue for a clean-up below the waterline.
The only official North East Maritime Trust website goes on to say:-
Our volunteers can participate in all aspects of boat building and care. Every week we offer hands on training and skills development, keeping alive the traditions of wooden boats on the North East coast. We also hold regular sailing days, and educational and promotional events.
Why not join our friendly team of volunteers?
Henry Frederick Swan and right, the Coble Royal Diadem II.
OUR BOATS Please find out about some restoration projects we have undertaken over the years. Read more ->
1 Coble “FRIARAGE” for restoration. 2 The Kernic a Boat building Project. 3 VIKING(c1908) 4 The Bedford Lifeboat & Carriage. 5 Royal Diadem II 6 Henry Frederic Swan (1918) Tynemouth Lifeboat.
*The restoration of, Rachel Douglas, Favourite, Sovereign and the coble, Peggy are completely missing from the only official North East Maritime Trust website as published by the self appointed Chair of the North East Maritime Trust.
Mick Dawson 28th September 2026
* Addition, 30-Sept-26 and the highlights over the following week-end.
1: Original Missing Archives post was about the years, 2011-2019, and I have managed to fill some of the gaps in them since the post about them was was made and I now wish to review the earlier gap of 6 years, Nov 2002 to Jun 2008. The post of November 2002 gives the reader the main reason for the existence of NEMT and I was one of the early volunteers helping to restore first the Rachel Doulas then the Favourite and during that time that I became a major party to the restoration of historic fishing vessels by the acquisition of Glad Tidings in 2003. It was not long after the purchase that I was told her original name was Peggy so when she was repainted and anti-fouled she was given back her original name and at the same time my name as her owner was painted on her port aft quarter:-
2: The name, M Dawson as the owner of Peggy remained on her port quarter while she was in the care of the South Shields Angling Boat Club and she sat on quayside at the Angling Boat Club for a good while before she could to put into the care of the only wooden boat restorer on the Tyne, Fred Crowell. In the meantime, I had to wait to put her into what I knew as Fred’s Shed because she had to join a queue because he had been asked, by more senior members of NEMT than I, to modify the seine-netters, Rachel Douglas and Favourite to make them more suitable for pleasure use and I made myself useful by helping with their restoration during that time. I found after some research, mostly by looking at what had been done to put other cobles back into sail that it was relatively easy to determine how long the mast and yard to be compared to her length and while Fred made them out of old telegraph poles, a sailmaker was found to make the sails to fit them.
While Fred goes into some detail about how cobles are built, in his tale about the saving of Peggy, it is not until the 23rd page of The Saving of The Peggy that see much about the mast and yard and more importantly, we also see that the ownership now includes Tim Dawson and that’s him helping to remove the mast from storage so that it could be put back in her prior to the launch,i.e. leave the shed.
3. It appears that some of the wood used to replace some of Peggy’s planks had not all been properly seasoned but this was of no import for nearly all of her new planks were to be well painted, including the ones directly supporting the gunnels.
The gunnels have to be fixed by bolting them to the stempeice, then the knees connecting them to the thwarts and finally bolting them the plank across the stern which supports the rudder and is known as the scut.
The top plank and the gunnel are then rounded off to make them comfortable to sit on and care should have been protect them from the weather. Sadly, this was not done, either on my watch or when I sold her to the NFHT and she needed a major repaint and while that was being done the owner’s name was changed again – to Charlie Lowdon.
It was a good while before I discovered the lie that Charlie had ever owned Peggy by painting his name on the port quarter and was rather annoyed that both Tim and I had been written out of the history of her preservation by a sleight of hand. If I’d been asked by the NEMT member(s) who commissioned the change of ownership to Charlie they would have been given short shrift and I would have told them that as Charlie had done so much more to help with the preservation of the Henry Frederick Swan than he had with the preservation of Peggy.
I also felt that it would have been more honest to make a plaque for him to go on the aft cabin of the HFS next to the one awarded to J Dudman than to falsely claim that he was ever an owner of Peggy.
If the author of the lie that Charlie had ever owned Peggy had asked me for permission to write Tim and myself out of the history of Peggy’s preservation, it would have been denied as I knew there was a more honest way of honouring Charlie Lowden’s work for the NE Maritime Trust.
PEGGY – Built 1924. 93 years. Believed to be the oldest fully restored Northumbrian coble. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT – National Maritime Museum; small boat register 1. What is the vessel’s ability to demonstrate her physical fabric? Peggy has not been compromised by alteration from her original build specification. Overall dimensions are 28′ long, 7′ 6″ beam and 2′ draft, though the rudder reaches 4′ below water level. Repairs and restoration have been undertaken to maintain original standards and materials. Framing is 60% original, planking 60%, masts and spars are replacements. Engine and gearbox have been replaced and the present engine is a Lister of uncertain age but probably dating from the 1950s. The paintwork replicates that typically carried by this type of coble on the coast of Northumberland throughout the twentieth century. It has not been possible to obtain archive photographs or other evidence for the painting of this boat during her period of use in the fishing industry. 2. What are the vessel’s associational links for which there is no physical evidence? Peggy, was built by the Harrison yard at Amble in 1924 “on spec” during a slack period. Unusually (for a coble) she was sold for pleasure use, the purchaser being a Mr Hall, resident of Beadnell in Northumberland. For this purpose Harrison’s fitted a cabin but it was not long before she lost her pleasure boat fittings, when sold on for fishing to Robert Rutter of Seahouses, as a typical coble with engine and auxiliary sail and registered BK7. She later worked back at Beadnell, then at Amble where she became BH177 and renamed Glad Tidings. Later in her history Peggy moved to Sunderland. As a fishing coble she worked long lines, salmon nets and pots for crab and lobster. Upon leaving the fishing industry Peggy was used as a pleasure boat at Hartlepool, before being bought in poor condition by an NFHT enthusiast in 2007. Restoration was undertaken in 2008 at the boatyard then owned by Fred Crowell, at South Shields. Further comprehensive restoration led by Dave Parker was completed in 2017 by NFHT and NEMT volunteers at the same boatyard. Now kept on the river Tyne and in almost original condition she is in the ownership of Northumbrian Fishing Heritage Trust. 3. How does the vessel’s shape or form combine and contribute to her function? Peggy is a typical Northumbrian coble of the kind used and built until the 1950s, to traditional specification similar to the sailing vessels of previous centuries. The design gradually evolved as engines became more efficient and fishermen sought cobles of greater proportions and versatility. These later cobles were built until the 1980s. The type, of which Peggy is representative, was built in large numbers and at one time several ports on the east coast had many such boats. Originally beach boats, their shape reflects many of the design and construction methods common in previous centuries. It is important to note that the hull design contains build elements of wooden North Sea craft of the sixth century and of British hide covered craft. – although such origins require further research. There is no centre keel as such, though a part keel commences at the forefoot and extends almost to a point amidships. For the aft two thirds of the boat – which is largely flat bottomed – there are two droughts or bilge keels upon which the vessel rests on the beach. Lack of a keel is compensated by the stability afforded by a very deep forefoot and a deep detachable rudder. The rudder is mounted outside a transom that rakes at 45 degrees. Peggy’s old rig was carefully surveyed from photographs and drawings of similar cobles and faithfully reproduced. The mast is stepped forward in the boat and rakes aft so that the dipping lug sail is hung centrally. The mast therefore does not take up valuable space amidships. On beaching, cobles were usually floated onto a pair of wheels on a low slung axle to be led off the beach to a place of refuge. Peggy normally resides at St Peter’s Marina and is used for training in traditional coble sailing skills, gatherings and visits to other ports.
Footnote: Peggy is now one hundred and two years old.